Validation of Eugenol in
Ethanol by UV Spectrophotometric Method
Yogita R. Indalkar1*, Dr. Aloorkar N.H.2
1Lecturer, College of Pharmacy (D. Pharm),
Degaon, Satara (MH) India-
415 004.
2Principal, College of Pharmacy (D. Pharm),
Degaon, Satara (MH) India-
415 004.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: yogitav.dalvi@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Eugenol
is a chief chemical constituent of clove oil and having lots of applications.
Thus development of a validated UV spectrophotometric method will always
advantageous. The method was validated according to International conference on
Harmonization (ICH) guidelines Q2 (R1) with respect to Accuracy, Precision,
linearity and range, Ruggedness, Robustness. This method is found to be linear
in range between 15-50 µg/ml presenting good correlation coefficient (0.991)
showing 98.87 % accuracy.
KEYWORDS: ICH, Accuracy,
Precision, linearity and range, Ruggedness, Robustness
INTRODUCTION:
Eugenol1-2
is chief chemical constituent of clove oil. Eugenol
has number of pharmacological actions such as Analgesic, Antioxidant,
Anesthetic, and Antimicrobial Anticancer Anti-inflammatory and Anticonvulsant. Eugenol has it’s applications in the fragrance and
flavoring industries also. Number of novel drug delivery
systems of eugenol have been reported for a
variety of applications. Thus development of a validated UV spectrophometic
method for Eugenol will be always be
advantageous as the method is simple and rapid.
Fig. 1:
Chemical structure of Eugenol.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS: 3- 5
Materials:
Eugenol
(pure) was gifted by S.H. Kelkar and Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai, India. Ethanol was purchased from Research Lab Fine chem. Industries,
Mumbai.
Equipments:
Single
pan Electronic Balance (ohaus corp,
USA AR0640 and UV spectrophotometer (pharmaspec 1700,
shimadzu, Japan) was employed in the study.
Preparation of standard solutions:
Eugenol
(100mg) was taken and dissolved in Ethanol and then volume was made up 100 ml
with Ethanol. The dilutions were made by ethanol to obtain standard solution in
the range 15-50 µg/ml. The absorbance of the resultant solutions was determined
at the λmax of 282 nm.
Accuracy:
Three
concentrations as 20 µg/ml, 30 µg/ml,
and 40 µg/ml were prepared nine measurements are carried out and averaged.
Result was compared to certificate of analysis.
Precision:
The
precision of the method was assessed by analyzing eugenol
for intra-assay precision and intermediate precision
A) Intra-assay precision:
Intra-assay
precision was assessed by analyzing eugenol in three
different concentrations (20, 30, 40µg/ml) of three times a day. The % RSD was
calculated for absorbance.
Fig. 2: UV spectrum of eugenol in ethanol
B) Intermediate Precision:
Intermediate
precision was carried out by doing full analysis of 30 µg/ml concentration by
change in analysts within the same laboratory followed by calculation of % RSD.
Linearity and Range:
The
Calibration curve was plotted using the concentration range of 15-50µg/ml .The
absorbance of the solutions was determined at 282 nm. A calibration curve was
constructed by plotting absorbance Vs concentration was determined.
Ruggedness:
Ruggedness
was measured by the triplet measurements of 15µg/ml and 30µg/ml by change in
operators in same lab. The % RSD was calculated for absorbance.
Robustness:
Robustness
was measured by the triplet measurement of 30µg/ml concentration by slight
change in concentration of solvent ethanol from 100% to 95 % followed by
calculation of %RSD
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION:
UV -Specrophotometry:
The
UV method for the estimation of Eugenol in ethanol
was validated . Fig 2 shows the UV spectrum of Eugenol in ethanol.
Accuracy:
Accuracy
was investigatigated by analyzing three
concentrations (20, 30, 40µg/ml) the average % purity of Eugenol
concentration in sample was found to be 98.87%
Precision:
A) Intra assay precision:
Intra
assay precision was assessed by analyzing Eugenol in
three different concentration (20, 30, 40µg/ml) of Eugenol
three times a day. The % RSD was found to be 1.78%.
B) Intermediate precision:
Intermediate
precision was assessed by analyzing Eugenol by change
in analyst. The %RSD was found to be 1.30%
Linearity and range:
The
absorbance of the prepared standard solutions (15-50µg/ml) was determined at
282 nm the mean absorbance was found to be .3131-1.016.the plot of absorbance
versus concentration (fig.3) obeyed Beer-Lambert’s law in above concentration
range with regression coefficient of 0.991
Ruggedness:
Ruggedness
was assessed by change in operator and change in concentration the % RSD was
found to be 0.52%
Robustness:
Robustness
was measured by slight change in concentration of solvent ethanol. The % RSD
was found to be 1.74 %
Table1: %
purity data for accuracy of UV method in ethanol
Concentration(µg/ml) |
Absorbance |
% Purity |
20 |
0.3748 |
97.05 |
20 |
0.3798 |
98.35 |
20 |
0.3776 |
97.80 |
30 |
0.5436 |
93.86 |
30 |
0.5615 |
96.96 |
30 |
0.5622 |
97.06 |
40 |
0.7964 |
103.15 |
40 |
0.7950 |
102.97 |
40 |
0.7912 |
102.47 |
Fig.3:
Calibration curve of eugenol in ethanol by UV spectrophotometry (282nm)
Table 2:
Linearity and Range
Concentration(µg/ml) |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
Absorbance |
0.3131 |
0.424 |
0.488 |
0.6538 |
0.7421 |
0.7964 |
0.915 |
1.016 |
Table 3: Validation Parameters
Parameters
Done |
Standard
Values |
Practical
Values |
Accuracy |
≥95% |
98.87 |
Intra-assay
precision |
RSD≤2% |
1.78% |
Intermediate
precision |
RSD≤2% |
1.30% |
Linearity
And Range |
Linear responses in calculated range Intercept=0 Coefficient of correlation=0.9991 |
Linear responses in calculated range i.e.15-50µg/ml Intercept=0 Coefficient of correlation = 0.9914 |
Ruggedness |
RSD≤2% |
0.52% |
Robustness |
RSD≤2% |
1.74% |
Table 4: Optical parameters:
Parameter |
Data |
λmax |
282nm |
E 1%,1 cm |
193 |
Range |
15-50µg/ml |
Regression Equation |
y =0.0205x |
Correlation coefficient |
0.9914 |
Slop |
0.0205 |
Intercept |
0 |
REFERENCES:
1.
Promod K, Ansari SH, Ali J. Eugenol: A natural compound with versatile pharmacological
actions. Nat prod commun 5(12); 1999-2006.
2.
Pomod K, Ansari SH, Ali J. Development
and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for the quantitative estimation
of eugenol. Asian J. Pharma.
2013; 3(2); 58-61.
3.
Snyder LR, Kirland JJ, Glajch
JL. Practical HPLC method development.2nd ed. willey
inter science publication; p.686-713.
4.
Sethi PD. Quantitative Analysis of Drug in pharmaceutical
formulation.3rd ed., CBS publication; p.50-64.
5.
ICH-Guidelines Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical procedures: Text and
Methodology, Geneva, Switzerland: 2005.
Received on 06.11.2015 Accepted on 05.12.2015
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Ana. 5(4): October- December, 2015; Page 178-180
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5675.2015.00028.9